Justin Trudeau’s approval of Kinder Morgan’s expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline has a BC group raising concerns– not over pipelines – but over safety and tanker traffic issues in relation to the Second Narrows Bridge.
In a statement, the group – called Concerned Professional Engineers (CPE) – says it’s been interested “in the hazard introduced by the bridges at the Second Narrows of Burrard Inlet, and we feel that the hazard has not been properly analyzed” for risk.
“We have always been of the opinion that if oil is to be shipped from the West Coast, that the safest and least risky port should be used,” said CPE spokesperson Brian Gunn.
The pipeline expansion is intended to increase the capacity of the existing pipeline from 300,000 barrels per day to 890,000 barrels per day.
“The TMX proposal implies the riskiest route, with a 10% chance of an 8.25 million litres spill (3000x the English Bay spill of 2015) in the 50 years of operating life,” Gunn added.
- Crude oil tanker moratorium to become law on BC's north coast
- Kinder Morgan pipeline approval is for 'greater good,' says Transport Minister Marc Garneau
- Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline rejected by Trudeau
- Kinder Morgan pipeline approved by Justin Trudeau
- Kinder Morgan pipeline approval 'profoundly' disappointing, says Vancouver mayor
CPE wrote an open letter to BC Premier Christy Clark this week, outlining why it believes a thorough risk assessment must take place before the project proceeds any further.
Their list of reasons include things like increased tanker traffic leading to an increased risk of collisions, and the fact that the “Port of Vancouver Authority and the Pacific Pilotage… cannot guarantee that there will be no collisions with the bridges…”
What is needed, the letter continues, “is a proper risk assessment that includes mitigations to reduce the risk, including: the use of tugs, the proper training of pilots, and improved navigation aids.”
CPE also expresses the need for an examination of “worldwide statistics of similar accidents and the probability of these accidents occurring in the Second Narrows transit,” the letter reads.
And when this risk assessment is completed, it “needs to be peer reviewed, and the results from that should be discussed with the public.”