Warranty claims can be tricky, especially if you don’t grasp the full scope of what it covers, as was the case with one B.C. man who purchased a mattress with 10-year coverage.
After the man’s warranty claim failed, he decided to pursue legal action through the BC Civil Resolution Tribunal.
The applicant in the case purchased a Sealy mattress from Leon’s Furniture. The mattress came with a 10-year warranty, but within a year, the man noticed it had begun to sag.
Sealy denied the warranty claim for a couple of reasons related to how he had set up the mattress.
- You might also like:
- B.C. man on the hook for thousands after hot ashes cause fire at neighbour's home
- Surrey furniture store owes thousands after loveseat switcheroo
- B.C. furniture store ordered to pay back thousands over squeaky sofa
The customer’s claim was against Leon’s Furniture, not Sealy. He claimed a refund of $1,151.92 for the amount he paid for the mattress, as it began sagging within a year.
In defence, Leon’s said that the customer was “responsible for making himself aware of Sealy’s warranty conditions” and that it wasn’t liable for his failure to comply with the warranty conditions.
Leon delivered the mattress to the customer on April 4, 2023. It came with warranty cards. The customer denied receiving the cards but didn’t offer any proof to convince the tribunal that he had not received them.
In April 2024, the customer made a warranty claim through Leon’s Furniture. Later that month, a Leon’s representative responded to the claim, informing the customer that it was denied. Leon’s notified the customer that his claim was dismissed for two specific reasons.
One, his bed frame did not have a centre support, which Sealy suggested could cause sagging issues. Additionally, he didn’t use a Sealy mattress box spring.
The tribunal decision offered additional details about the denied warranty claim.
“The copy of the Sealy warranty in evidence said the warranty only covered manufacturing defects when the mattress or foundation was used with a bed frame that provides continuous support. It went on to say the mattress must be supported by a Sealy box spring or an ‘approved lifestyle foundation’, which appears to include a wood slat bed frame or a bed frame with a rigid bridge bar in the middle with a supporting leg,” the tribunal decision states.
Trying to shift the blame to Leon’s Furniture, the customer claimed that while the advisor mentioned the 10-year warranty, he did not provide details about its specifics. The customer had no evidence to suggest that the customer service advisor had misrepresented the warranty in any way.
Finally, the tribunal said that because the customer “used the mattress in a way that voided the warranty,” it does not entitle him to a refund from the furniture store.
The tribunal dismissed his claim, but it serves as a valuable reminder to exercise due diligence and read the fine print when it comes to warranties for any product.